Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2002No. 2002-0298PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 69.] THE STATE EX REL. THE ILLUMINATING COMPANY v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. The Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas,

2002-Ohio-5312.] Public utilities—Electric companies—Prohibition—Writ prohibiting common pleas court judge from exercising jurisdiction over respondent’s fraud and rescission claims against electric company and those declaratory relief claims not involving indefiniteness and lack of consideration granted, when—Allegations of violations of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Russ v. TRW, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SessleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Camp St. Mary's Ass'n of the West Ohio Conference of the United Methodist Church, Inc. v. Otterbein HomesOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Ohio Department of Mental Health v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API