Legal Opinion
Gould v. Sanford
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 23, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
Two separate road improvement districts in Scott County were created by statutes enacted by the General Assembly of 1919 (Special Acts 1919, vol. 1, p. 491, vol. 2, p. 2586), one of the said districts being designated as the Albert Pike Eoad Improvement District and the other designated as the Poteau Valley Eoad Improvement District of Scott County. The two statutes were identical in form and substance, except as to the references^ to the respective roads to be improved and the naming of the commissioners.
Powers were conferred upon the commissioners of the respective districts to construct…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kirst v. Street Improvement District No. 120Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Arlington Hotel Co. v. RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Bowman Engineering Co. v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Page v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Perkins v. Cedar Mountain Sewer Improvement District No. 43Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Martin v. Street Improvement District No. 349Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Lewis v. Delinquent LandsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Shackleford v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.