Legal Opinion
Perkins v. Cedar Mountain Sewer Improvement District No. 43
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 9, 2004No. 04-79PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
This appeal arises out .of a lawsuit in which Richard A. Perkins, an engineer. sued the Cedar Mountain Improvement District of Garland County for breach of contract when the district abandoned a contemplated improvement project. The trial court awarded Perkins damages and ruled that he was entitled to recover the entire amount of damages through a tax levy pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 14-92-238 (Repl. 1998). The trial court also awarded post-judgment interest, but declined to award prejudgment interest. Finally, the trial court awarded attorney’s fees to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Burcham v. City of Van BurenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. Richard's Honda YamahaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reynolds Health Care Services, Inc. v. HMNH, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Windsong Enterprises, Inc. v. UptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- White v. Arkansas Capital Corp./Diamond State VenturesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Running M Farms, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Larry Walther, Director, Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration; Andrea Lea, State Auditor; Dennis Milligan, State Treasurer; And the Central Arkansas Planning and Development District v. Mike WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.