Shackleford v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
Rafter stating the facts). The circuit court was right to refuse to award the writ of mandamus. The record shows that the contract made by appellant with the school district was not executed in the manner prescribed by law. The adoption of the prescribed mode of contract under the statute is a jurisdictional prerequisite to the power to contract at all. The reason is that the authority is conferred by statute, and the directions of the statute must be substantially followed. It is the policy of the law that a contract shall not be executed until there is an opportunity for all the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hunt v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Arkansas National Bank v. School District No. 99Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Buchanan v. FarmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Gould v. SanfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Huie v. BarkmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barney v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Bingham v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Refunding Board of Ark. v. State Hwy Audit Comm'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Horton v. McConnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974