Legal Opinion

Martin v. Street Improvement District No. 349

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 10, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant ¡brought suit at law against the Marshall 'Street Annex of Street Improvement District No. 349 of Little Rock to recover fees alleged to he due him as attorney for the annex district and for certain court costs which he alleged he had expended in its behalf.

The commissioners of the improvement district waived service of summons, and entered their appearance and confessed judgment for the amount sued for, and judgment was rendered by consent for $7,733. This judgment was rendered September 30, 1927. On October 3, 1927, Herman Heiden filed an intervention, in which he alleg’ed that he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bayou Meto Drainage District v. ChaplineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Sain v. BogleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Gould v. SanfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. T. J. Moss Tie Company v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Miller County Highway & Bridge District v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Page v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Union Sawmill Company v. LangleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Democrat Printing & Lithographing Co. v. Van Buren CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Shackleford v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Water Improvement District 1 of Benton v. BrinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API