Legal Opinion

Welfare Federation v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1945No. 30405 to 30412PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

Under Section 5611-2, General Code, the question for our consideration is: Are the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals reasonable and lawful?

As phrased by the Attorney General, the question is raised: “Did the Board of Tax Appeals make an unlawful or unreasonable decision when it refused to exempt from taxation that'portion of a leased building occupied by appellant and various charitable organizations, and leave subject to taxation the remaining portion thereof occupied by commercial tenants?”

The appellant has phrased the matter as involving-three questions as follows:

“1. Does the property…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee Ex Rel. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. City of Toledo v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Gymnastic Ass'n of the South Side of Milwaukee v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Incorporated Trustees of the Gospel Worker Society v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Wehrle Foundation v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re Bond Hill-Roselawn Hebrew SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Ohio Grocers Assn. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Battelle Memorial Institute v. DunnOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Cleveland Osteopathic Hospital v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API