Welfare Federation v. Glander
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
Under Section 5611-2, General Code, the question for our consideration is: Are the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals reasonable and lawful?
As phrased by the Attorney General, the question is raised: “Did the Board of Tax Appeals make an unlawful or unreasonable decision when it refused to exempt from taxation that'portion of a leased building occupied by appellant and various charitable organizations, and leave subject to taxation the remaining portion thereof occupied by commercial tenants?”
The appellant has phrased the matter as involving-three questions as follows:
“1. Does the property…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee Ex Rel. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- City of Toledo v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Gymnastic Ass'n of the South Side of Milwaukee v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Incorporated Trustees of the Gospel Worker Society v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Wehrle Foundation v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re Bond Hill-Roselawn Hebrew SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Ohio Grocers Assn. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Battelle Memorial Institute v. DunnOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Cleveland Osteopathic Hospital v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.