Legal Opinion

France Co. v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1944No. 29762PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The determination of this appeal calls for the construction of Sections 5546-1 and 5546-25, General Code, as applied to the use of the equipment and supplies in question in the operations of the appellee in its plant yards.

The pertinent portion of Section 5546-1, General Code, under. which appellee claims exemption, is as follows:

“ ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales excepting those in which the purpose of the consumer is * * * to use or consume the thing transferred ■ directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale by * # * processing * *

The appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Bailey v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Kennedy v. State Board of Assessment & ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Terteling Bros. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API