Legal Opinion

Dye Coal Co. v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1944No. 29970PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question presented is whether the trucks of the appellant were to be used directly in mining, and, therefore, the sales tax inapplicable under- and by virtue of the provisions of Section 5546-1, (Jen eral Code, which specifies exceptions from the tax imposed upon retail sales. The portion of such section essential here is as follows:

“ ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales excepting those in which the purpose of the consumer is (a) to resell the thing transferred in the form in which the same is, or is to be, received by him; or (b) ■to incorporate the thing transferred as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saunders Mills, Inc. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Terteling Bros. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. West Lake Quarry & Material Co. v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Tri-State Asphalt Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API