Legal Opinion

Glowner v. De Alvarez

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1909No. Civ. No. 599PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los, Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial.. George H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

This is an action to quiet title. Plaintiff was the record owner of the lands in question which were sold to the state for taxes and a deed therefor made to the state in August, 1897. On November 5, 1901, a deed was made by the tax collector of Los Angeles county, where the property is situated, on behalf of the state, to the defendant, and on that day she went into possession of the entire premises under said deed, claiming title thereto, and remained in the exclusive possession thereof adverse to the whole world until the commencement of the action. She paid the taxes on the lands for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cavanaugh v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Carpenter v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Klumpke v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McNoble v. JustinianoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Myran v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Lewis v. FarrahArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Phelan v. DrescherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Kern County Land Co. v. NighbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. C & F REALTY CORPORATION v. MershonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API