Legal Opinion

Phelan v. Drescher

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1928No. Docket No. 3450PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet title to about twenty-four acres of land in Butte County, and to establish the dividing line between their lands and those of defendants. The defendants answered, asserting title by adverse possession to the land claimed by plaintiffs, and alleging that the dividing line between their lands is different than that claimed by plaintiffs. Defendants also allege in their answer that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the various provisions of the statute of limitations.

Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs, from which judgment…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Dauberman v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Roberts v. BraeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Thomas v. HarlanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Lewis v. FarrahArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Townsend v. KoukolMontana Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API