Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Farrah

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1947No. 4927PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

For the sake of clarity the parties will be referred to as they were in the trial court. The plaintiffs (appellees) are the owners of a two-acre tract of land located outside the corporate limits of the City of Phoenix, in the SEJ4 of Sec. 32, Tp. 3 North, Range 3 East. This quadrilateral tract has a 62-foot frontage on North Central Avenue and extends easterly some 1,-800 feet to the right of way of the Arizona Canal. The defendants (appellants) own a five-acre tract of land immediately adjoining the land of plaintiffs to the south. There is a citrus grove upon defendants’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glantz v. GabelMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Janke v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Costello v. MuheimArizona Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Gusheroski v. LewisArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wallace v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tenney v. LuplowArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ammer v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Campbell v. SUPERIOR CT, IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Sturges v. TongelandArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Ellingson v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API