Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Lewis

California Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1897No. S. F. No. 550PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. D. J. Murphy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of a lot of land situated at the southeast corner of Sacramento and Steiner streets, in the city of San Francisco. The complaint is in the usual form, alleging plaintiff’s ownership of the lot in fee and her ouster therefrom by defendants. The an*19swer denies the allegations of the complaint and alleges that at all the times mentioned in the complaint the defendant, George W. Osborne, was, and still is, the owner in fee, in possession and entitled to the possession of the said lot, and further pleads in bar of the action the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cavanaugh v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Latham v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Pico v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Owsley v. MatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Fly v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. Salt Lake Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Standard Quicksilver Co. v. HabishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API