Legal Opinion

Reese v. Borghi

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1963No. Civ. 20518PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Defendants Franzo and Mary Borghi, husband and wife, appeal from a declaratory judgment granting plaintiffs Clyde L. and Marie W. Reese, husband and wife, a right-of-way of necessity over a parcel of land previously conveyed to defendants by plaintiffs. Defendants also appeal from an order denying their motion to strike plaintiffs’ cost bill. Although represented by counsel below, plaintiffs appear here in propriis personis.

The principal facts are not in dispute. In 1953 plaintiffs acquired five contiguous parcels of land referred to in the record as Whiteside, B-l, B-2, C and A, together…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Corea v. HigueraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Blum v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. LeDeit v. EhlertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Tapscott v. Mexican Colo. River Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Taylor v. WarnakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Carroll v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lichty v. SickelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API