Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2009No. 20090076PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Róndale Grant appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. We hold the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting a nurse practitioner’s report into evidence, and the State produced sufficient evidence to convict Grant of the crime. We affirm Grant’s conviction. However, because the criminal judgment does not clearly state the jury entered a verdict of guilty, we remand to the district court for correction of the clerical error.

I

[¶ 2] Defendant Grant and Randie Johnson have three children together,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  2. Livingood v. MeeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. United States v. Frederick YazzieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. State v. JandaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. VondalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. FrieszNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. HinojosaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. GomezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Estate of HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API