State v. Friesz
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tufte, Justice.
[¶ 1] Rodney Friesz appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of manslaughter and arson. We conclude the district court did not err in denying his motion to suppress evidence and sufficient evidence exists to sustain his convictions for manslaughter and arson. We affirm Friesz’s convictions. We remand, however, for the district court to correct a clerical error in the criminal judgment because the judgment does not clearly state the jury entered a verdict of guilty to the offenses.
I
(¶ 2] On October 9, 2014, Friesz shot Geno Jassmann in a home in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. EgglestonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. NobleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. LelmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. KennyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. McCrearyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.