Legal Opinion
State v. Janda
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1986No. Cr. 1165PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Michael John Janda appeals from the judgment and sentence entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition in violation of § 12.1-20-03, N.D.C.C. We affirm.
Because no issue has been raised with regard to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, we need not present a detailed recitation of the facts. Between 8 and 9 a.m. on June 17,1985, Janda engaged in a sexual act with the complainant in the complainant’s home. The central dispute at trial was whether the complainant consented to the act.
Janda has raised the following issues: Whether…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ThielNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. PayneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.