State v. Hinojosa
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Salome Fierros Hinojosa appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of delivery of methamphetamine within one thousand feet of a university. We affirm, concluding that the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act was not violated by the failure to hold Hinojosa’s criminal trial within 90 days of the filing of his request for disposition of the charge against him and that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction.
I
[¶ 2] In September 2009, Hinojosa was charged with delivery of methamphetamine within one thousand feet of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- State v. HatchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. RomeroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LafromboiseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. WatsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. MondragonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Ennen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.