Legal Opinion
State v. Gomez
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 2011No. 20100100PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Ciro Gomez appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of continuous sexual abuse of a child. Gomez argues the district court erred when it failed to issue a special verdict form, the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction, the court erred by refusing to consider his challenge to the ethnic and racial makeup of the jury panel, and his sentence violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In January 2009, Gomez was charged with continuous sexual abuse of a child in violation of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- D.E. v. K.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Black Hills Trucking, Inc. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Holkesvig v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Interest of C.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.