Sandoval v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NUCHIA, Justice.
Appellant, Ernesto Sandoval, was charged in separate indictments with two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child. A jury convicted him of both offenses and assessed punishment at 30 years confinement for each offense. In this appeal, appellant raises the following points of error: (1) factual insufficiency; (2)-(3) admission of hearsay statements; and (4)-(5) impermissible jury arguments. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
At trial, the State offered the testimony of complainant, Norma Campos, two Houston police officers, and a doctor. The defense called two witnesses,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Fairow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Swarb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Cole v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.