Legal Opinion
Key System Transit Co. v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1932No. Docket No. 8192PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An appeal by defendant City of Oakland, a municipal corporation, and certain of its officers from a judgment enjoining the enforcement of ordinance numbered 4240, N. S., adopted October 1, 1928, which required all persons operating electric street-cars within the city to maintain upon each of said cars while containing passengers a motorman and a conductor.
On December 19, 1928, the district attorney of Alameda County instituted a prosecution against the plaintiff and one of its employees, charging a violation of the ordinance in that they operated a one-man street-car on what is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- People ex rel. Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- In Re MeansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Los Angeles Railway Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Redwood City v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.