Legal Opinion
Tustin Heights Assn. v. BD. OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE CTY.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1959No. Civ. 5917PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pacts
STONE, J. pro tem. *
The respondent board of supervisors enacted a land use plan for Orange County entitled “The Districting Ordinance.” The respondent, The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, petitioned the Orange County Planning Commission for a conditional use permit for the establishment of a church and an elementary parochial school in the 100-E4 Small Estates District. After hearings, the planning commission recommended denial of the applica-' tion on the grounds that (1) “The site is not large enough to take care of students under customary state standards and also provide…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Aries Development Co. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.