Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Monroe

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided January 13, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert M. Stolz, J.

Defendant is charged with aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [1]), harassment in the first degree (Penal Law § 240.25), and menacing in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.15). Defendant now moves to dismiss the accusatory instrument for facial insufficiency.

The accusatory instrument states the following:

“Deponent [Charlene Grant] states that on July 29, 1999, deponent was exiting the train station at 125th Street & Lexington Avenue * * * and that she saw the defendant. Deponent states that the defendant insisted on speaking…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. PaytonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
  4. People v. AmalfiRochester City Court · 1988
  5. People v. MurrayCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  2. People v. BehlinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  3. People v. VenturoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API