Legal Opinion

People v. Amalfi

Rochester City Court

Decided November 14, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph D. Valentino, J.

FACTS

Defendant has been charged with aggravated harassment, *941second degree, in violation of Penal Law § 240.30 (1) which provides:

"A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he:
"1. Communicates, or causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means or otherwise, with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm”.

The facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. CirruzzoNassau County District Court · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. PriceCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  2. People v. LivioNassau County District Court · 2000
  3. People v. McDermottNassau County District Court · 1994
  4. People v. HernandezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  5. People v. RuscianoEastchester Justice Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API