Legal Opinion
People v. Venturo
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided December 7, 2015PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Raja Rajeswari, J.
The defendant, Hingino Venturo, is charged with aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [1] [a]) and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]). He moves for an order dismissing all counts as facially insufficient pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law §§ 170.30 (1) (a); 100.15 (3) and 100.40 (1) (a) and for other relief. The People oppose the motion to dismiss.
Facial Insufficiency
The defendant’s motion to dismiss for facial insufficiency is denied for the reasons articulated below.
Procedural History
The defendant was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HercskySuffolk County District Court · 2016
- Smith v. Town of LewistonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022