Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Payton

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided April 29, 1994PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph F. Bruno, J.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Defendant, charged, inter alla, with two counts of menacing (Penal Law § 120.14 [2]), which allegedly occurred on two separate occasions, now moves to dismiss the two counts on the grounds of facial insufficiency.

The information also charges the defendant with crimes committed against the complainant in two other incidents which, though not the subject of this motion, may relate to whether the defendant engaged in a "course of conduct” which is proscribed by Penal Law § 120.14 (2).

CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES

The defendant contends that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. TralliAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
  5. People v. DiazCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. McGillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. United States v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. McCowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. MurrayCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API