Legal Opinion
State v. Tracy
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1995No. 18978PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice.
Tracy appeals Ms conviction under SDCL 41-1-8 for intentionally interfering with the lawful hunting of the Craig Ambach hunting party. Tracy argues the Ambach party was not lawfully hunting and that Ms conduct did not constitute criminal interference. We reverse the conviction based on our statutory construction of SDCL 41-9-1.1.
FACTS
Pat Tracy is the farm manager for JES Farms, a farm owned and operated by Harvey and Andrea Sheehan. The Sheehan farm is located in both Sully and Hughes counties along the Grey Goose Road. Apart from Tracy’s farm management duties, Tracy also…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. HarrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BattestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. SponheimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Barney v. Burlington Northern RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Millard v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Reis v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Douville v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Sioux Falls v. Hone Family TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Patterson v. Plowboy, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.