Legal Opinion

Barney v. Burlington Northern Railroad

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1992No. 17672-aPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDITH MEIERHENRY, Circuit Judge.

Landowners seek to quiet title to a railroad right-of-way running across their lands from Custer to Deadwood, South Dakota. The State of South Dakota (State) claims it is entitled to the right-of-way. The landowners claim that the State’s conversion of the right-of-way into recreational trails is a taking of their reversionary interests deserving of compensation from the State.

FACTS

Congress under the provisions of the General Right-of-Way Act of 1875, 43 U.S.C. § 934, 1 granted right-of-way corridors across public lands to the Grand Island and Wyoming Central;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Leo Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Thompson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API