Barney v. Burlington Northern Railroad
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUDITH MEIERHENRY, Circuit Judge.
Landowners seek to quiet title to a railroad right-of-way running across their lands from Custer to Deadwood, South Dakota. The State of South Dakota (State) claims it is entitled to the right-of-way. The landowners claim that the State’s conversion of the right-of-way into recreational trails is a taking of their reversionary interests deserving of compensation from the State.
FACTS
Congress under the provisions of the General Right-of-Way Act of 1875, 43 U.S.C. § 934, 1 granted right-of-way corridors across public lands to the Grand Island and Wyoming Central;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Leo Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Thompson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.