Legal Opinion
Douville v. Christensen
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Robert Douville (Douville), a resident of Chamberlain, South Dakota, seeks a writ of mandamus against Chamberlain and Brule Townships for the removal of an earthen dam obstructing a section line right-of-way located on the border between the two townships. We reverse the trial court’s denial of the writ.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] The section line right-of-way at issue in this case is approximately one and one-half miles in length and is located between Brule and Chamberlain Townships. The section line extends westward to the edge of the Missouri River (Lake…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- K & E Land and Cattle, Inc. v. MayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Rapid City v. HoogterpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Pederson v. Canton TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rodriguez v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Esling v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Black Hills Central Railroad v. City of Hill CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State, Department of Game, Fish & Parks v. Troy TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Kappenman v. KlipfelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.