Legal Opinion

Reis v. Miller

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Reis, Hanson, Nelson and Kjerstad (Plaintiffs) appeal a denial of their deelarato-ry judgment action against state officials (Defendants) in their official capacities. Plaintiffs claim the original easement creating section line rights-of-way did not give the legislature the power to allow hunting, fishing or trapping on the section line rights-of-way and that SDCL 41-9-1.1 is a violation of equal protection. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2] Plaintiffs each own land subject to an easement for a section line highway. Reis is a resident of Tripp County, Hanson is a resident of Day…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Application of SDDS, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Benson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Rapid City v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dan Nelson, Automotive, Inc. v. VikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Agar School District No. 58-1 v. McGeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Patterson v. Plowboy, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API