Legal Opinion

Millard v. City of Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Millards and City each moved for summary judgment on the issue of whether a right-of-way easement existed on the north thirty-three feet of Millards’ property. The trial court granted City’s motion and Mil-lards appeal. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] In 1989, Michael and Jacqueline Millard purchased property from Cornell and Lois Munkvold. The property was located in Lincoln County, but was within three miles of the boundaries of the City of Sioux Falls.

[¶ 3.] In 1987, prior to selling the property, Munkvolds had the,property platted. 1 The Munkvold Addition plat, which…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spenner v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Walther v. KPKA Meadowlands Ltd. PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Specialty Mills, Inc. v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gesinger v. GesingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HohmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. National Sun Industries, Inc. v. South Dakota Farm Bureau Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. E.P. v. RileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Fin-Ag, Inc. v. Pipestone Livestock Auction Market, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Fryer v. KranzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API