Legal Opinion
In Re Stanton
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 1996No. 95-BG-325PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
This is John Stanton’s third petition for reinstatement to active practice following his suspension for a year and a day in 1983. Twice on previous petitions, this court has adopted the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that Stanton not be reinstated. The Board once again recommends against Stanton’s reinstatement, concluding that Stanton has failed to adequately establish that the “resumption of the practice of law by the attorney will not be detrimental to the integrity and standing of the Bar, or to the administration of justice, or subversive…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- State v. BohannonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re RoxboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.