Legal Opinion

Matter of Stanton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1987No. 86-1390PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a petition for reinstatement to the Bar of the District of Columbia filed pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 21(5), by an attorney who was suspended from the practice of law for a year and a day because of several disciplinary rule violations. The hearing committee which conducted a hearing on the petition and the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) have recommended that reinstatement be denied. The Office of Bar Counsel, which participated in this matter before the hearing committee and the Board, joins in their recommendation to this court. We agree that petitioner has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Henderson v. Snider Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. John Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re BordersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. In Re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API