Legal Opinion

In re Stanton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2004No. 03-BG-767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1983, we suspended petitioner John Stanton from practicing law in the District of Columbia. See In re Stanton, 470 A.2d 272 (D.C.1983) (Stanton I); In re Stanton, 470 A.2d 281 (D.C.1983) (Stanton II). Before us now is petitioner’s fifth request for reinstatement.1 Hearings having been held on that request, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that we deny it.

We accept the Board’s recommendation of denial for the reasons stated in its report, which is appended to this opinion. As detailed in the Board’s report, petitioner has made no serious attempt, despite numerous…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. In re the Petition for Reinstatement to the Bar of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. In Re BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re JosephDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API