Legal Opinion
Snyder v. Maryland Casualty Company
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 8, 1963No. 3068PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
The primary question on this appeal is whether the court below committed reversible error by refusing to compel answers to certain of appellant’s interrogatories.
Appellant brought suit on a “Boiler and Machinery Policy” of insurance for damage to a hot water boiler. Appellee contended that the policy did not cover the loss. A lengthy trial was had; many witnesses were called to testify; the issue was finally submitted to the jury, and they returned a verdict in favor of appellee.
Pursuant to the rules of the Court of General Sessions concerning discovery, appellant,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Newell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Leishman v. Radio Condenser Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Doherty v. ShamleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weber v. BiddleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- White v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Dunn v. Evening Star Newspaper CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Scott v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.