Legal Opinion

Newell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1944No. 2778PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

A. Mae Newell owned 22 lots in Armour-dale Addition to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. She executed an oil and gas lease covering the premises which contained the conventional royalty provision of 1/8th of the oil and gas produced. By various assignments, Phillips Petroleum Company acquired lease; and it was consolidated or communitized for oil and gas purposes, which had the effect of limiting the royalty rights of A. Mae New;ell in the entire area to 11/12ths of 1/8th royalty interest. In December, 1930, Phillips completed a producing well on the premises. A. Mae New-ell…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Sierra Berdecía v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  2. Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  3. James F. Bell v. Swift & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Weber v. BiddleWashington Supreme Court · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API