Legal Opinion

White v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1981No. 80-905, 80-1056PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

The sole question presented in these consolidated appeals is whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing appellant’s lawsuits for failure to prosecute. Because a substantial reason for appellant’s inability to proceed to trial was the court’s erroneous denial of appellant’s motion to compel discovery, the court abused its discretion in dismissing the cases. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

On January 3, 1977, appellant Mabel White filed suit against appellee Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), alleging that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Taylor v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Garces v. BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Frazier v. Center Motors, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Futrell v. Department of Labor Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Rosenthal v. National Produce Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Clampitt v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Neill v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Haynes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API