Legal Opinion
Leishman v. Radio Condenser Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1948No. 11652PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
LeRoy J. Leishman owned reissue patent No. 20,827, a reissue of patent No. 2,108,538. Crosley Radio Corporation, hereafter called Crosley, Radio Condenser Company, hereafter called Condenser, and General Instrument Corporation, hereafter called General, manufactured mechanical tuners used in radio receiving sets. Crosley manufactured radio receiving sets containing tuners manufactured by it and sold such sets to Associated Wholesale Electric Company, hereafter called Associated, which sold them to others. Condenser sold tuners manufactured by it to Galvin Manufacturing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- United States Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corp. v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Fretwell v. Gillette Safety Razor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gustav H. Bobertz, Jr. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Weber v. BiddleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Ronald M. Byrnes v. The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Leishman v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Dunn v. Evening Star Newspaper CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.