Legal Opinion

Scott v. Jackson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1991No. 90-843, 90-881 and 90-900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

The issue we must decide is whether this court has jurisdiction to review pretrial orders of the trial court requiring discovery of information under the “extraordinary necessity” exception to the District of Columbia’s statutory peer review privilege governing certain medical records and reports. D.C.Code § 32-505(a) (1988). We hold that the orders, lacking requisites of finality, may not be appealed at this time.

I

These are consolidated appeals from discovery orders directing appellant Washington Hospital Center Corporation to produce the personnel file of appellant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crane v. CraneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Hammond v. WeekesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Jackson v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Walter E. Lynch & Co., Inc. v. FuiszDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API