Legal Opinion

Burst v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 1931No. 13118PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice BlEase.

This case presents a splendid illustration of the law’s delays — delays occasioned more, however, by the lawyers and the failure of jurors to agree than'by the Courts, although the latter seem to have contributed a little, too, to the long existence of the cause, without a final determination. It is hoped that the decision of this Court at this time will at last bring the cause to an end.

On December 24, 1921, the plaintiff Mrs. Essie Mae Durst was injured, as she alleged, while a passenger on a train of the defendant railway company.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  2. Lorick & Lowrance, Inc. v. Julius H. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Rhodes v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. Durst v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Hall v. WoodwardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fennessey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Dow Drug Co. v. NiemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Kirby v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Cato v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Hanner v. Hillcrest Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API