Legal Opinion

Fennessey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1938No. S. F. 15893PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Defendants Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Thomas Foley appeal from an order which granted plaintiffs’ motion for a retrial and plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial, and which denied defendants’ motion for entry of a certain form of judgment in their favor.

Plaintiffs Irene Fennessey and William J. Fennessey, her husband, sued for damages received by Irene Fennessey when she was struck by an automobile operated as a jitney bus by defendant George L. Manecis. At the time of the accident said plaintiff was in or near a safety zone on Market Street, in the city of San Francisco, at the southwest…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hyer v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Automobile ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Benson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Thompson v. Cal. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API