Legal Opinion

Hanner v. Hillcrest Land Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 5, 1932No. 13378PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonitam.

The transcript of record contains this statement: “To Messrs. Bomar & Osborne, attorneys for defendant: Please take notice that the plaintiff, R. P. Hanner, intends to and does hereby appeal from the verdict of the Court and jury in the above styled case and from the order of Hon. T. S. Sease, overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, to the Supreme Court of South Carolina, on the grounds and exceptions to be served upon you later.”

Respondent’s attorneys asked that the appeal be dismissed for that the appeal is not from a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tunstall v. the Lerner Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. American Publishing & Engraving Co. v. Gibbes & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Burst v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. ByarsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. Molair v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. IseleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Sherbert v. School Dist. 85, Spartanburg Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Wright v. . McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Spartan Mills v. LawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Rierson v. . HansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API