Legal Opinion

Hall v. Woodward

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 11, 1889PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Before Wallace and Witherspoon, JJ., Fairfield, September, 1887, and February, 1888. The order of Judge Wallace was a short order granting the motion for leave to amend, on the' authority of Savings Bank v. Strother, 22 S. C., 552. Judge Witherspoon’s decree fully states the case, and was as follows : This is an action for contribution among sureties.

Read the full summary

Before Wallace and Witherspoon, JJ., Fairfield, September, 1887, and February, 1888. The order of Judge Wallace was a short order granting the motion for leave to amend, on the' authority of Savings Bank v. Strother, 22 S. C., 552. Judge Witherspoon’s decree fully states the case, and was as follows : This is an action for contribution among sureties. The plaintiff, in substance, alleges in his complaint that on December 21, 1860, one W. E. Hall, as principal, together with Daniel Hall, E. J. Hall, Edward G. Palmer, and the defendant, Thomas W. Woodward, as sureties, executed and delivered…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McIver.

The plaintiff brings this action as assignee of his father, Daniel Hall, sr., against the defendant, Woodward, to recover one-half of the amount paid by. him in satisfaction of a judgment which had been recovered against Daniel Hall, sr., on a note, upon which it is alleged he and Woodward were joint sureties. In his original answer the defendant raised no issue, either as to the execution of said note by him, or as to the fact that he and Daniel Hall, sr., were co-sureties on said note, but rested his defence upon other grounds, one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. . LeighNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Beardsley v. StoverNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Vibbard v. RoderickNew York Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  2. Fogel v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Burst v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Murphy v. Plankinton BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Pickett v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API