Legal Opinion

Peavy v. C. W. Merydith Contracting Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1923No. 24,525PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

Plaintiff seeks to recover under the workmen’s compensation act. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant on a demurrer to the petition. The plaintiff appeals.

The petition alleges facts to bring the defendant within the terms of the workmen’s compensation act. The defendant was. engaged in building a hard-surface road near Peck, situated in Sedgwick county. The plaintiff was engaged in hauling brick by team and wagon from the railroad at Peck to the place of construction of the highway. The petition alleges—

“That this plaintiff was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Stuart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Hicks ex rel. Hicks v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Romerez v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Anderson v. Hotel CataractSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Covert v. John Morrell & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Addington v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Springston v. IML Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API