Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Hotel Cataract
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1945No. File No. 8731PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.
An employee of the Minnehaha Hotel Company died as the result of an assault by a co-employee. The father of the deceased claimed compensation under SDC 64.0402(1). The Industrial Commissioner concluded that the injury did not arise out of .and in the course of the employ ment and denied compensation. The circuit court reversed the decision of the commissioner and remanded the claim with directions to enter findings and conclusions for the claimant. The employer and its insurer have appealed. For convenience we refer to the appellants as the employer.
The decedent, Orvin Anderson, and Earl…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Boek v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Zygmuntowicz v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New JerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Meyer v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- King v. Johnson Bros. Construction CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Grauel v. South Dakota School of Mines & TechnologySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.