Legal Opinion

Covert v. John Morrell & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1933No. 31,326PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action for compensation for an injury sustained by plaintiff while in defendant’s employment.

The claim was denied by the commissioner of workmen’s compensation, but upon appeal was allowed by the district court.

Claimant was employed by John Morrell & Company as a traveling salesman. While driving upon the highway near Belleville, the windshield of his car was broken by a chunk of mud intentionally thrown from another car. Glass from the windshield was driven into his eye, causing the loss of sight and necessitating its removal.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Stuart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Haas v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Blair v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Hensley v. Carl Graham GlassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Tompkins v. George Rinner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Jones v. Lozier-Broderick & GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API