Legal Opinion

Hirschfeld v. Commission on Claims

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 12, 1977PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

The plaintiff began this proceeding in the Court of Common Pleas by service of process upon the defendant commission on claims. The nature of the proceeding is the subject of disagreement between the parties. The plaintiff claims that it is an appeal under the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act from a decision of the commission on claims. The defendant views it as an independent action, and claims that it is barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

Connecticut has long recognized the common-law principle of the state’s immunity from suit on a claim for liability without its consent. It…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. Association for the Benefit of Non-Contract EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Connecticut Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. Doe v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API