Legal Opinion

Leedom v. Kyne

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 15, 1958No. 14PublishedCited by 988 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whittaker

Section 9 (b)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 453, 61 Stat. 143, 29 U. S. C. §159 (b)(1), *185provides that, in determining the unit appropriate for collective bargaining purposes, “the Board shall not (1) decide that any unit is appropriate for such purposes if such unit includes both professional employees and employees who are not professional employees unless a majority of such professional employees vote for inclusion in such unit.” The Board, after refusing to take a vote among the professional employees to determine whether a majority of them would “vote for inclusion in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by988 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

983 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API