Legal Opinion
Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 7, 1976No. 75-268PublishedCited by 665 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
This case requires us to determine which venue provision controls in the event a national banking association is sued in a federal court for allegedly violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: the broad venue provision of the Securities Exchange Act, which allows suits under that Act to be brought in any district where the defendant may be found, or the narrow venue provision of the National Bank Act, which allows national *150banking associations to be sued only in the district where they are established.
The petitioner, Hyman Radzanower, instituted a class action in the District Court for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by665 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
660 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.