Legal Opinion

Segal v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1988No. S002014PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

The Review Department of the State Bar Court recommends that petitioner Lloyd Martin Segal, who was admitted to practice in 1976, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years; that execution of the order be stayed; and that Segal be placed on probation for three years on conditions which include actual suspension for one year, various reporting provisions, passage of the Professional Responsibility Examination, supervision by a probation monitor referee, and compliance with rule 955, California Rules of Court.

The recommendation is based on the hearing…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Lopez v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Arm v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Levin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ridge v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re NaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Twohy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API