Legal Opinion
Buckley v. Buckley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1957PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The defendant and the plaintiff, at the time of the transactions forming the subject matter of this action, were husband and wife, although they have since been divorced. The complaint was in three counts. The defendant filed a counterclaim. The plaintiff recovered on each count of the complaint and the defendant on the counterclaim. This appeal attacks the judgment on only the first and second counts of the complaint. The cross appeal of the plaintiff has been withdrawn.
After a partial trial, the complaint was amended by filing a substituted first count, and to this an amended answer was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ives v. City of WillimanticSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Potter v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Norton v. ShepardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- Jarvis v. CunliffeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Wells v. CarsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Sturtevant v. SturtevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Zapolsky v. SacksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Joyce Halling and Medcon Inc., a Utah corporation v. David A. Yovanovich and Ornella Dalla BonaWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Anderson v. Pension & Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.